<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Antipatter &#187; alpha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antipatter.com/tag/alpha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antipatter.com</link>
	<description>The Web, The Business, The Smoke and Mirrors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Not Your Father&#8217;s Beta</title>
		<link>http://antipatter.com/2008/07/not-your-fathers-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://antipatter.com/2008/07/not-your-fathers-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alpha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antipatter.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As I watched Django announce its 1.0 Alpha release, I experienced a vague sense of disorientation, which I suddenly realized was coming from the actual, correct use of the terms Alpha, Beta and Gold (or Final) by the Django project team.  You see, I work in the web industry, where those terms are generally just [...]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I watched Django <a title="Django 1.0 Alpha" href="http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2008/jul/21/10-alpha/" target="_blank">announce its 1.0 Alpha release</a>, I experienced a vague sense of disorientation, which I suddenly realized was coming from the actual, correct use of the terms Alpha, Beta and Gold (or Final) by the Django project team.  You see, I work in the web industry, where those terms are generally just abused.</p>
<p>The proper use of the Alpha and Beta terminology are to describe early pre-releases of software, for the purpose of making the software available for late-stage acceptance testing.  Alpha and Beta software is, by definition, not ready for prime time.</p>
<p>Of course, this very concept is all rooted in pre-Internet shrink-wrapped software.  The Gold master was a CD, (or a cassette tape etc) that was physically shipped out.  It was critical to get the app into a stable state, because once it shipped it would be expensive to patch it.</p>
<p>With websites, the code that runs them is <em>updated all the time</em>.  I can pretty much guarantee that with any major website you frequent, the code that&#8217;s running it this month is slightly different from what was running it last month.  Or yesterday, for that matter.  The entire concept of releases is somewhat nebulous on the web.</p>
<p>But the business world thinks that software terminology is cool.  So we&#8217;ve labeled every web 2.0 website &#8220;Beta&#8221;.  It&#8217;s pretty widely understood now that &#8220;Beta&#8221; means &#8220;don&#8217;t blame us too hard if there&#8217;s bugs&#8221;.</p>
<p>In the agency world, there&#8217;s an even more shadowy use of these greek letters.  It has become a kind of psychological trick used to get clients to focus on only essential features.  It goes something like this:</p>
<p><strong>Client</strong>:  I want a website with 8 million features of dubious value.  And a pony.<strong><br />
Vendor</strong>: Okay, okay.  We&#8217;ll get you that pony.  But let&#8217;s get the real core stuff out the door first.<strong><br />
Client</strong>: I want a pony!<strong><br />
Vendor</strong>: Okay, well how about we release Alpha this year with the core features, then Beta the year after that.  <em>Then</em>, we can focus on getting that pony for you in the 1.0 release, in two years.<strong><br />
Client</strong>: Well, okay.  As long as I get a pony for 1.0, then.</p>
<p>In a sane universe, these would simply be considered different releases: 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0.  But that doesn&#8217;t score the proper political points.  All that stuff that the client read about in Wired magazine <em>has</em> to make it into 1.0 in their minds, so the agency responds by re-defining what 1.0 means.  And that means abusing the Alpha and Beta terms.</p>
<div class="acc_license"></div><!---->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://antipatter.com/2008/07/not-your-fathers-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

