<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Antipatter &#187; microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antipatter.com/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antipatter.com</link>
	<description>The Web, The Business, The Smoke and Mirrors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Everything but the Kitchen Sync</title>
		<link>http://antipatter.com/2008/07/everything-but-the-kitchen-sync/</link>
		<comments>http://antipatter.com/2008/07/everything-but-the-kitchen-sync/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>loren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[just works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkfest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sync]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antipatter.com/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;Math Sync is hard&#8221; I keep hearing.  Why does this area suck so much?  Why is it so damn hard to synchronize my calendar and contacts with multiple sources?  What is up with that? I mean, seriously, isn&#8217;t this just version control?  Haven&#8217;t we solved this problem a million times with Subversion, Mercurial, Git and [...]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<a title="Like, totally" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbie" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Math</span></a> Sync is hard&#8221; I keep hearing.  Why does this area suck so much?  Why is it so damn hard to synchronize my calendar and contacts with multiple sources?  What is up with that?</p>
<p>I mean, seriously, isn&#8217;t this just version control?  Haven&#8217;t we solved this problem a million times with <a title="Subversion" href="http://subversion.tigris.org/" target="_blank">Subversion</a>, <a title="Mercurial" href="http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/" target="_blank">Mercurial</a>, <a title="Git" href="http://git.or.cz/" target="_blank">Git</a> and so on?  Why is this such a big deal?  Take the latest version of the content, merge it in.  If there&#8217;s concurrent modification then identify a conflict and kick it up to the user to resolve.  Done.  Look, they even came up with a standard, <a title="SyncML" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SyncML" target="_blank">SyncML</a>, on order to normalize communication of sync information.</p>
<p>And yet still, in 2008, I&#8217;m sitting here on the verge of starting with a new employer, and I&#8217;m wondering about what I&#8217;m going to do about their Exchange server.  Do I go for a Mac and use Entourage?  Try to push everything into Google calendar?  Use <a href="http://spanningsync.com/" target="_blank">Spanning Sync</a> to connect up iCal?  These are a lot of acrobatics &#8211; why can&#8217;t this Just Work?</p>
<p>Just to demonstrate that I&#8217;m not completely talking out of a nether-oriented-orifice, I&#8217;ve even started to do some <a title="django-sync" href="http://code.google.com/p/django-sync/" target="_blank">work to lend sync services to Django</a>.  It should be no surprise that I&#8217;m letting Mercurial do the heavy lifting.</p>
<p>Why is this space so backwards?  Well, I&#8217;m tempted to blame Microsoft &#8211; they managed to get the whole world to buy in on Exchange.  Companies that made otherwise sane technology decisions went with classic vendor lock-in, probably because there wasn&#8217;t much else out there to compete at the time.  Microsoft (man, it feels tired just talking about this) plays well with other Microsoft products, but not well with others.  There&#8217;s no <a title="CalDav" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CalDAV" target="_blank">CalDAV</a> connector for Exchange, for example, meaning there&#8217;s no standards-based access to their calendar.  Grr.</p>
<p>Another reason this space is so lame is because sync has been too long considered to be an application feature, rather than a service (perhaps an OS service?) available to be leveraged by various programs.  This is the approach <a title="Sync Service" href="http://developer.apple.com/macosx/syncservices.html" target="_blank">now taken by OS X</a>, so I guess there&#8217;s some hope.  Even in the relatively advanced world of OS X, there&#8217;s a lot of hacks still going on.  I&#8217;m currently sync&#8217;ing <a title="OmniFocus" href="http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnifocus/" target="_blank">OmniFocus</a> on my desktop with the <a title="OmniFocus on the iPhone" href="http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnifocus/iphone/" target="_blank">OmniFocus</a> on my iPhone, using a <a title="WebDav" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebDAV" target="_blank">WebDAV</a> server that I set up myself.  <a title="NetNewsWire" href="http://www.newsgator.com/INDIVIDUALS/NETNEWSWIRE/" target="_blank">NetNewsWire</a> syncs by using <a title="NewsGator" href="http://www.newsgator.com/" target="_blank">NewsGator</a>.</p>
<p>Dodgy.  I mean, this sort of works, but people don&#8217;t go around rolling their own disk i/o or network stacks just because their applications use them.  This stuff should just be available to use.  And it should Just Work.</p>
<p>UPDATE:  Ironically, <a href="http://www.google.com/support/calendar/bin/answer.py?answer=99355" target="_blank">Google calendar announced CalDAV support today</a>.</p>
<div class="acc_license"></div><!---->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://antipatter.com/2008/07/everything-but-the-kitchen-sync/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

